Posted on Thursday, 3 May 2012

I think we have over 30,000 abortions a year in Pennsylvania. […] I think adoption is a much preferable way to go. When you see that kind of number, if an ultrasound, which is not invasive at all, would convince somebody maybe to carry that baby to term and give it up for adoption and save that life, I think that’s the way to go.

Pennsylvania Governor Hopes To Change Women’s Choice On Abortion | ThinkProgress

Yes, because this works just as well as attempting to make gay people straight by denying them rights.

What is wrong with these people?

(via tinfoilandtea)

Yes….because 30,000 babies would have NO problem finding a forever home….ugh. I really hate people sometimes.

23 notes

  1. mageofmerde reblogged this from stfueverything
  2. awesomeocelot reblogged this from tinfoilandtea
  3. consistentlyaverage reblogged this from stfueverything
  4. zhounder reblogged this from cactustreemotel
  5. juneof1992 reblogged this from stfueverything
  6. cactustreemotel reblogged this from stfueverything
  7. fatquean reblogged this from stfueverything and added:
    Let’s say every state had 30,000 abortions a year. If we “saved” all those children and then put them into foster care...
  8. amovingtarget reblogged this from stfueverything
  9. peacelovemusichappyness reblogged this from stfueverything
  10. fleurdelanuit reblogged this from stfueverything
  11. stfueverything reblogged this from tinfoilandtea
  12. hollylocks reblogged this from tinfoilandtea
  13. crazyblueskies reblogged this from hairtrending
  14. hairtrending reblogged this from tinfoilandtea
  15. jolly-dolly reblogged this from tinfoilandtea
  16. i-sauntered-vaguely-downwards reblogged this from tinfoilandtea
  17. tinfoilandtea posted this